This is the question we are asked more than almost any other. It comes from managing agents juggling multiple clients, from freeholders who are not sure where their obligations end, and from commercial tenants who have just received an enforcement notice and are not sure why it applies to them. The short answer is that in a multi-tenant building, more than one person is usually legally responsible — and each of them is accountable for their own area of control, regardless of what anyone else is or is not doing.
This article explains the legal framework, sets out who is responsible for what, and highlights the areas where confusion is most likely to arise.
The Legal Foundation: the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
Fire safety law in England and Wales is governed principally by the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 — known as the FSO. It replaced a patchwork of earlier legislation with a single risk-based regime and introduced the concept of the "responsible person": the individual or organisation with a legal duty to manage fire safety in a given premises.
Article 3 of the FSO defines the responsible person as the employer, where the premises is a workplace, or otherwise the person who has control of the premises in connection with carrying on a trade, business or other undertaking. In a building with multiple occupants, this almost always means there is more than one responsible person, each with duties over the area they control.
The legislation was significantly reinforced by the Building Safety Act 2022, which introduced new duties for higher-risk buildings — those of at least 18 metres or seven storeys with two or more residential units — and created the Building Safety Regulator. Even buildings that do not meet that threshold are affected indirectly, as the Act raised expectations across the sector and prompted more active enforcement.
Who Is Responsible for What
It helps to think of the building in layers. The structure and common areas form one layer; individual tenancies or demised units form another. Different parties control different layers, and the FSO attaches responsibility accordingly.
Responsibility by Area
The following table sets out who typically holds responsibility for each part of a multi-tenant building. Lease terms can alter this picture, and a current fire risk assessment should resolve any ambiguity specific to your building.
| Area | Typically responsible | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Structure & external walls | Freeholder | Post-2022, explicitly includes cladding systems |
| Common lobbies, corridors, stairwells | Freeholder / Managing Agent | Day-to-day management usually with the agent |
| Fire doors in common areas | Freeholder / Managing Agent | Regular inspection required under the Fire Safety Act 2021 |
| Fire doors to individual flats | Freeholder / Leaseholder | Depends on lease terms — a frequent source of dispute |
| Building-wide fire alarm | Freeholder / Managing Agent | Even where zones serve individual units |
| Emergency lighting in common areas | Freeholder / Managing Agent | Monthly function tests; annual full duration test |
| Commercial units (demised areas) | Commercial Tenant | Tenant responsible for FRA within their own demise |
| Plant rooms & shared services | Freeholder / Managing Agent | Often overlooked; can present significant ignition risk |
| HMO communal areas | HMO Licence Holder | Subject to local authority licensing conditions |
Shared Responsibility Is Not Split Responsibility
Multiple parties holding legal responsibility does not mean the duties can be divided neatly and then forgotten. The FSO requires responsible persons who share a building to co-operate and co-ordinate their fire safety measures. Any changes to the building — a tenant fitting a new partition wall, creating a new storage room, or blocking what was previously an escape route — must be communicated and assessed, because they can alter the risk profile of the entire building.
The Areas Where Confusion Most Commonly Arises
Across the buildings we assess in Chester, Cheshire, Merseyside and North Wales, the same friction points appear repeatedly.
Fire doors to individual flats
In many leasehold arrangements, the entrance door to a flat forms part of the building's passive fire protection system, but the leaseholder treats it as their own door. Whether the freeholder or the leaseholder is responsible for maintaining it depends on lease terms — but the Fire Safety Act 2021 placed new duties on the responsible person to inspect those doors at least annually in buildings of eleven or more storeys, and at least every three months in taller buildings.
Alarm systems covering both common areas and individual units
Mixed-use buildings where a single addressable system serves a ground-floor commercial tenant and residential floors above are a regular source of confusion. Who pays for maintenance? Who responds to faults? Who is responsible when a zone fault goes unattended? These questions need clear answers before a problem arises, not after.
Tenant alterations not reported to the managing agent
A new partition wall, a new storage room, a blocked escape route — any tenant alteration can change the risk profile of the entire building. The responsible person's fire risk assessment needs to reflect the building as it actually is. An assessment carried out before a significant alteration is, in effect, an assessment of a different building.
What a Good Fire Risk Assessment Does in a Multi-Tenant Building
A fire risk assessment for a multi-tenant building should do considerably more than list hazards and assign them a risk rating. It should set out clearly who controls each part of the building, who is responsible for each fire safety measure, and what each tenant's obligations are. Where there is ambiguity — and there almost always is — the assessment should resolve it rather than leave it unaddressed.
It should also be reviewed whenever there is a material change to the building or its use. A new commercial tenant, a change of use on one floor, a major refurbishment, an alteration to the alarm system — any of these can change the risk picture significantly and should trigger a review. If your assessment is more than two years old and the building has changed, it is almost certainly out of date.
What This Means in Practice
If you are a managing agent or freeholder, the starting point is a current, professionally produced fire risk assessment for all common areas, a structured fire door inspection programme, and clear records of all maintenance and testing. You also need a documented process for onboarding new tenants that makes their obligations explicit, and a mechanism for tracking any alterations they make to their demise.
If you are a commercial tenant, you need your own fire risk assessment for your unit, fire safety training for your staff, and a clear understanding of which elements of the building's fire safety systems fall within your responsibility. If your lease is ambiguous, it is worth clarifying now rather than waiting for an enforcement notice to prompt the conversation.
If you are an HMO landlord or licence holder, local authority inspection is a real and increasing prospect. The documentation needs to be in order and the physical measures — alarms, fire doors, emergency lighting — need to be properly maintained.
We work with all three groups regularly across Chester, Cheshire, Merseyside, the Wirral and North Wales. If you are uncertain about where your responsibilities begin and end, please get in touch.
We carry out fire risk assessments and fire door inspections for multi-tenant buildings across Chester, the North West and North Wales — including residential blocks, commercial premises and HMOs. If you are not confident that responsibilities in your building are clearly defined and properly managed, please get in touch.
Not sure where your fire safety responsibilities begin and end?
We provide thorough, professionally qualified fire risk assessments and fire door inspections for multi-tenant buildings across Chester, the North West and North Wales.